Writing is used primarily to document thought – either for individual posterity or to be shared with another or many. It used to be an act bordering on the sacred. Not only did you need to be one of the privileged few that could actually produce recordable script, you had to have the means to do it. Paper had to be handmade. Whether it be papyrus or vellum etc. It was a delicate and time consuming process. Not to mention the writing utensil itself. Quills had to be cut, ink made. In short, if you had something to record, you better be sure it was important.
If you were careless and made an error it was nearly impossible to correct without evidence of your folly being left behind. Whether that be a spilled ink stain, or an area where the vellum had to be scraped clean. Even in modern time, if you messed up with an ink pen or typewriter you had to smear white out on it. There was always a trace of your inattention to perfection.
Nowadays you can record thought with a few key strokes while lying in bed half awake in the middle of the night. If you make a mistake you hit a single backspace key which takes less than half a second. Never in the history of the world have we had greater ease with which to express our thoughts and yet the vast majority of what is produced is thoughtless.
The hallmarks of a typical bunker are that 1) you dig it yourself 2) it alters your worldview – in essence it buries it, literally.
So while I was at the park the other day noticing all the kids and adults alike with heads buried in their tablets and phones, it occurred to me that these are the modern day bunkers.
Purchased by choice, it allows one to dive into one’s own self constructed world. After all you pick your apps, your friends, your wallpaper – everything. It is a perfectly insular world in which if someone says something critical either about you personally or about an issue upon which you have an opinion – you can ban them from your sight – never to see or hear a word of dissent again.
You don’t see anything you don’t wish to see. To actually encounter “the enemy” you would have to lift your eyes above the bunker and seek them out. If, presumably, they are in a bunker too across the way – you would have to make an even grander effort by actually crawling out of the comfort of the womb into the unknown and trudge across the field by yourself to find them. Alone, because more than likely you are the only person who has made the effort to abandon the bunker.
You would likely encounter opinions and languages unfamiliar to you. It would be an endless challenge with many rocky roads over previously unchartered territory. Yet you and you alone have the ability to forge your own path. When more and more people connect in a real, rather than artificial environment outside the bunker there may be peace, there may be war – but above all else it is pure, authentic, reality.
I find it interesting that out of the multitudes of very good people and very evil people – we often reduce their plurality to a few singular representations. So for example out of the countless people who committed atrocities in WWII you practically never hear of any explicit name associated with carte blanche evil other than Hitler. Out of all those involved in the movement for independence from India the only figure most can name is Gandhi. For all those in America who marched for civil rights, practically none are nameable by most aside from Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
(Those in between good and evil always seem to fall through the cracks of history or are shoved into either the good box or the bad box by those who would prefer an ill fitting box with a label as opposed to no label at all – the absence of a box being completely incomprehensible to civilization as we know it.)
It’s as if there is so much stimuli in the given world at any moment that our consciousness cannot effectively categorize and memorialize all around us on a continual basis without having to “dump some data” every now and then.
Most people cannot deal in pluralities very effectively even with the most conscientious effort. Ironically, there are many cultures throughout the world that in terms of their mathematics only have words for 1,2,3 and then “many.” They readily admit that anything beyond 3 is too cumbersome to digest. Yet the so called advanced societies have throughout history often labeled these very same communities as primitive.
Hate is not an immaculate conception. It doesn’t suddenly burst onto the scene without intent. Whether knowledge of that intent is active or passive is another matter which only the bearer of the rotten fruit can truly ascertain with even a hint of accuracy.
Hate isn’t spread like pixie dust. It doesn’t just happen upon you by chance encounter with someone or something with which you have nothing in common. It is a slow growing pathogen which once fully in bloom is like the most stubborn of weeds that is practically impossible to eradicate. It is spread through contact with receptive hosts.
I do not believe there is any antidote that will ever completely erase its presence once it is within you. It can however be diminished into a state of dormant harmlessness. The most effective antidote that is known to all but practiced by few (not from lack of knowledge but from lack of will) is simply patience. The patience to lift unfamiliar veils and discern the truth for yourself.
It’s like Borges library of babel. The amount of knowledge that can be gleaned from any given situation is infinite. The more you investigate, the more paths you uncover. Surface knowledge is two dimensional at best and the worst casing for ammunition. It either fails to explode upon impact or in the worst scenarios it spreads its destruction indiscriminately.
I rarely find time to be a linear concept. It seems more often than not that it is either stagnant or in reverse. Stagnant in the sense that one day feels identical to the next due to routines we seem practically addicted to. Reverse, in that the world seems to forever recycle past catastrophes to experience them all over again. It’s almost like we crave adversity.
Even in the old sci-fi films the time machines rarely seem to go into the future, it always seems so much easier and irresistible to put it in reverse. Even though having either studied the distant past, or having lived through the recent past, we illogically feel that it would be exciting to tread the same ground over and over again instead of going into a future unknown.
Rarely when people give speeches do we remark, “wow that was a glimpse of the future.” It’s usually more along the lines of, “that reminded me of so and so.” I don’t think I’ve ever seen a speech that was so entirely “new” that people couldn’t fit it into a box whose label was already turning yellow from having been stuck there for so long. How refreshing it would be to hear an idea that wasn’t recycled from things long ago discarded.
There have been numerous times in my life when I have felt anchored and in many ways trapped by materialism. Having lived in the same house for 40+ years I have accumulated a lot of stuff as I imagine many others have as well. Every few years I sold off various things to try and make some room and a little money. No matter how much I sold it was still a daunting thought whenever I had the urge to move somewhere else. What would I do with the rest of the “stuff”? While it has provided me with a comfortable life, I think in many ways it has stifled the wanderer in me and perhaps that has not been such a good thing.
Since the death of my father I have found the notion of departing from even the most banal object, painful if not impossible. The entire house has been transformed from objects into memories. Everything is either something father gave me as a gift, something he used, something he never figured out how to use, etc. Practically everything evokes a memory of him in one way or another. Parting with any of it, especially for money, feels like a betrayal – a dismissal of all the memories it evokes.
I suppose the greatest testament to my father’s life is not that he had a lot of stuff, but my realization this Christmas that practically every object in this house was either a gift from him, or something he bought in order to exercise his creativity in order to inspire others. The house is full of the aromas of selflessness, purpose and light. How does one ever go back to looking at items as merely objects again?
As most know, the reason we see color has to do with the colors in wavelengths of light. When light hits an object the wavelength(s) that are rejected are what we perceive as the color. We do not see those colors absorbed by the object. So in essence the world as you perceive it is a collection of rejections.
It’s similar to the concept that when we look into a mirror we are not seeing are true selves but a reversed image. Therefore, we never see ourselves as others see us.
What all this leads to is the interesting concept that we never see the world as it truly is. When looking at an apple we’ll only see the color stream that is rejected from absorption – red. How different would the world appear were we able to see not what is rejected, but what is absorbed? It would lend new meaning to the old phrase, seeing the world through rose colored glasses.
How lovely would it be if we extended the concept further and instead of unquestioningly accepting surface “realities” that we try and see what is absorbed – what seeps into our innermost psyches that truly shapes who we are?
To reject everything is to appear white – a blank slate, a two dimensional personality if you will. Yet to absorb everything is to appear black. In a sense being plunged into darkness. Perhaps the darkness of knowing too much. After all too much reality, information overload, can lead to depression over where to start in making sense of it all. I suppose the happiest medium is somewhere in the middle. Giving and rejecting at will. Absorbing and reflecting at random intervals in order to ignite the light within and to pass the torch to those passing by.
You can throw a dart at a map and your chances of hitting upon an area with contention is more likely than not. Whether it be all out wars, small skirmishes, elections or domestic strife within a single home, it seems unhappiness in varying degrees abounds these days.
In so many cases people are looking for solutions in all the wrong places. Lifting random rocks has never been a pathway towards finding light. Rare is the case in which shifting aside the rock allows the Messiah to get out and about to save the world from its self induced insanity.
Rocks are heavy for a reason, they’re not meant to be moved about. Typically they contain elements that neither gain nor give benefit to what is above.
Throughout the corporate world I saw the worst of the worst rise to the top. Turn on the TV and you see the exact same trend in governments throughout the world via elections, coups and the like. And how many times have I seen friends marry the first thing they found after moving a rock for all the wrong reasons only to suffer a lifetime of tepid relations and in the worst cases outright abuse.
I don’t know what the solution is other than looking within and reaching to your neighbors to rationally try and comprehend and maneuver about an increasingly irrational world. Only I beg you, don’t go about overturning rocks.
We are such an inquisitive species, we constantly question, review, analyze and attempt to anticipate practically everything. When we have an accident, we typically chalk it up to being “a matter of course”, “fate”, or an unforeseeable interruption of an otherwise reasonably predictable life. It is rare that we spend more than a moment, if that, analyzing what has befallen us. When we trip, we get up and keep walking. When we spill a drink, we clean it up and get a refill etc.
An accident is in essence a negative act. Rarely life altering or life ending except in the most extreme circumstances, but an irritating interruption of routine nonetheless. We don’t wish for accidents, we simply expect them to come about unexpectedly and then we move on without question.
So why do we so often react in disbelief when encountering a miracle? When someone unexpectedly wakes from a coma or other life threatening situation – while we are overjoyed, we cannot explain it. Our rational reasoning fails us and in delirious confusion we more often than not say God had a hand in it and that is that. Yet for some the conundrum doesn’t end there, because what if you don’t believe in God? That opens up yet another circular path trying to explain the unexplainable.
What is interesting is that we practically never search for reasons for the negative mishaps of our life, but spend endless amounts of time, for some entire lifetimes, trying to get to the bottom of positive accidents otherwise known as miracles.
I was reading an interesting passage from Augustine the other day contemplating the definition of what exactly is meant by “present” in terms of time. It’s interesting to consider that the minute you say “now,” as soon as your vocal chord ceases to resonate you are already in a new, future “now” and the “now” you just proclaimed is in the past. It seems in adulthood that linear progression is lightning fast. We’re forever treading water in the past while trying to anticipate the future without ever truly living in the present.
And yet when you’re an infant hardly cognizant of the world around you, let alone of your own place in it, you don’t really have a concept of past and future. It would seem improbable for a baby to lie there and think back upon the delicious breakfast it just had or wonder when dinner was coming. Everything seems eternally “now.” It’s like an elongated present that only shrinks as you grow.